Prove that the following rules of inference are derivable from our
rules of ¬Intro, ¬Elim, ^Intro, ^Elim, vIntro, vElim,
Intro,
and
Elim:
Modus Tollens (or "Denying the Consequent"; a variety of
Elim;
also, a variety of ¬Intro):
From ()
and ¬
--------------
Infer ¬
Hypothetical Syllogism (or "Transitivity of the Material
Conditional"; a variety of
Intro)
From ()
and ()
--------------
Infer ()
Constructive Dilemma (or "Reasoning by Cases";
a variety of vIntro):
From ( v )
and ()
and ()
--------------
Infer ( v )
Represent the English sentences from
HW #3, problem #3, in our language
for propositional logic in such a way that you can prove that sentence
3e follows validly from sentences 3a-3d. Then prove it syntactically!