Not yet done---one may say not yet begun from the start, but here is the head: Instead of asking an existential question of the kind that spearheaded classical computation, such as Is there a resurrection?, let us ask the corresponding counting question, of the kind that tends to be more important to quantum computation:
How many resurrections are there?---specifically involving you.
Your choices are basically
Many people have said that religion has been ginned up to avoid the "zero" answer. Just by knowledge of history, that is rather sad, you see. However, there is no need for me to argue against it. Science as represented in this book is already making a fine job of that.
This book as written favors the "many" answer. However, I believe the difference between this and "one" may come down to a matter of interpretation.
It is not yet timely to write out everything to go into this essay. But for some of the body, see the middle section of my eulogy for my father, and my talk slides here.
Update, Easter 2013: I am drawing ideas from N.T. Wright's book Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church, currently being read and discussed in my faculty study group. For instance, Wright's view of the soul is similar to what I surmised in the eulogy. This will take time, and the operative rule is that other surmises cannot go here until they are applied.
Dei gratia completur