PhilCS 4/584, Spring 2010
Position Paper #2 Grading Rubric	             Version:  20 Feb 10
========================================================================

1.  Prem 1 (Knuth's characterization of "algorithm")	

	agree?	why?	0 = no answer
			1 = answer, no reason
			2 = answer, unclear reason
			3 = answer, clear reason

------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.  Prem 2 (Prog langs express/implement algorithms)

	agree?	why?	0,1,2,3, as above

------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.  Prem 3 (Prog langs are equiv to TM prog lang)

	agree?	why?	0,1,2,3, as above

------------------------------------------------------------------------

4.  Prem 4 (Some real comp progs violate Knuth's def)

	agree?	why?	0,1,2,3, as above

------------------------------------------------------------------------

5.  Conc 5 (So, such progs don't implement TMs)

	1..4/.'.5 valid?	
	Why?	

			0 = no answer
			1 = answer, no explanation
			2 = answer, weak explanation
			3 = answer, good explanation

	agree w/ 5?	
	why?		0,1,2,3, as for 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

6.  Conc 6 (So, such progs are not computable)

        5/.'.6 valid?
	Why?
	
		        0 = no answer
                        1 = answer, no explanation
                        2 = answer, weak explanation
                        3 = answer, good explanation

        agree w/6?  
	why?    	0,1,2,3, as for 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

7.  Citation style:

        used sources w/o citing                         -3
        used sources w/ incomp & incorrect citation     -2
        used sources w/ incomp XOR incorrect citation   -1
        not applicable                                   0

------------------------------------------------------------------------

8.  Attached draft 1 & list of peer editors
	to demo that draft 2 <> draft 1?                 0
    Didn't                                              -1      

========================================================================

The total is 24 points, which, following my grading theory, maps into
letter grades as follows:

letter  CSE484          both    CSE/PHI584

  A                     23-24
  A-                     22
  B+                     21
  B                     19-20
  B-                     18
  C+                     17
  C     14-16                   9-16
  C-    11-13
  D+     9-10
  D                     5-8
  F                     0-4    
------------------------------------------------------------------------